Skip Navigation
Danielle Lederman and Benjamin Hinks

Danielle Lederman and Benjamin Hinks Write “East Penn Verdict Is An FLSA Cautionary Tale For Employers” for Law360

A federal jury returned a record $22 million verdict last month for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in Su v. East Penn Manufacturing Co. Inc. The case, which was brought in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), sought unpaid overtime wages for more than 7,500 employees who worked at East Penn Manufacturing Co. Inc. (East Penn), one of the world’s largest battery manufacturers.

The DOL asserted claims that East Penn did not pay its employees for the time they spent changing in and out of uniforms and protective gear, and the time they spent showering – protective measures that were undertaken to reduce the exposure to workplaces hazards. While the donning and doffing concept is not a new rule under the FLSA, it’s an area where even sophisticated employers can struggle with the nuances of wage and hour law.

In their Law360 article, “East Penn Verdict Is An FLSA Cautionary Tale For Employers,” Danielle Lederman and Benjamin Hinks discuss the case and the numerous learning opportunities for employers, including being wary of applying “reasonable time policies” for donning and doffing, the consequences of failing to keep complete records and the payment of liquidated damages under the FLSA. Here is an excerpt:

Employers Should be Wary of Applying “Reasonable Time” Policies for Donning and Doffing

Importantly, East Penn did not dispute that the time spent by its workers donning, doffing and showering on site was compensable.

Instead, East Penn argued in favor of its policy that allocated a set 15 minutes of compensable time for these tasks, which it deemed to be a reasonable amount of time. Specifically, in lieu of tracking and paying employees for the actual amount of time they spent performing these tasks, East Penn granted employees a five-minute grace period at the beginning of their shifts to don uniforms and equipment, and 10 minutes at the end of their shifts for doffing and showering.

The DOL argued that, as a matter of law, East Penn was required to record the time it took employees to don and doff their gear and shower and pay its uniformed employees for that time.

Continue reading the Law360 article “East Penn Verdict Is An FLSA Cautionary Tale For Employers.

 

 

 

About the Authors

hinks listing
Stay Connected
LinkedIn

Associate

Benjamin J. Hinks

Ben Hinks is an attorney in the firm’s Employment & Labor practice. He represents employers in litigation matters, including wage and hour claims, discrimination actions, non-competition and trade secret disputes, and contract claims before the courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and administrative agencies. Ben also helps counsel clients through a full range of employment issues including hiring, termination, personnel policies and handbooks, leaves of absence, internal investigations, employee discipline and DEI initiatives.

Stay Connected
LinkedIn

More Posts by Author ›

Danielle Lederman
Stay Connected
LinkedIn

Associate

Danielle Jurema Lederman

Danielle Jurema Lederman, co-editor of the Case for Inclusion blog, is an associate in the firm’s Employment & Labor Practice Area. She represents employers in all stages of mediation, arbitration, and litigation at the administrative, state, and federal levels. Danielle is an experienced trial attorney and has successfully litigated multiple employment matters through to summary judgment and trial.

Stay Connected
LinkedIn

More Posts by Author ›

About the Authors

hinks listing
Stay Connected
LinkedIn

Associate

Benjamin J. Hinks

Ben Hinks is an attorney in the firm’s Employment & Labor practice. He represents employers in litigation matters, including wage and hour claims, discrimination actions, non-competition and trade secret disputes, and contract claims before the courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and administrative agencies. Ben also helps counsel clients through a full range of employment issues including hiring, termination, personnel policies and handbooks, leaves of absence, internal investigations, employee discipline and DEI initiatives.

Stay Connected
LinkedIn

More Posts by Author ›

Danielle Lederman
Stay Connected
LinkedIn

Associate

Danielle Jurema Lederman

Danielle Jurema Lederman, co-editor of the Case for Inclusion blog, is an associate in the firm’s Employment & Labor Practice Area. She represents employers in all stages of mediation, arbitration, and litigation at the administrative, state, and federal levels. Danielle is an experienced trial attorney and has successfully litigated multiple employment matters through to summary judgment and trial.

Stay Connected
LinkedIn

More Posts by Author ›

Related Posts

View All People ›

    To get in touch, please call us at 508-791-3511 or fill out the form below. Fields in orange are required.

    Stay Current

    Subscribe to Bowditch’s updates, alerts and programs.

    Subscribe to All

     


    You can also follow our Bowditch Blogs. Please subscribe for new post notifications directly on the blogs. They are easily accessible in the main navigation under the Insights+News dropdown.

    An email confirmation will be sent upon submitting this form.